Adjudication goes ahead despite Covid 19

Millchris Developments v Waters

The respondent’s solicitor  was self-isolating and could not attend the adjudicator’s site visit – should an injunction be granted?

Millchris Developments v Waters (2020) 4WLUK 45; (2020) BLM, Jefford J.

Facts

Millchris Developments built a new residential property for Mr Waters. Mr Waters alleged that he had overpaid £45,000 and brought an adjudication against Millchris in March 2020.  An Adjudicator was appointed who announced that he would proceed with adjudication despite the corona lockdown and ordered a site visit.  Millchris’s solicitor was self-isolating.  She applied for an injunction to stop the adjudication going ahead until after the lockdown.  She said she could not attend a site visit, could not make representations on behalf of her client, and it was impossible for her to get a witness statement from the client.

Held

1. There was no risk of a serious breach of natural justice  if the adjudication went ahead. These were normal problems, not caused by the lockdown, and the Adjudicator had offered to get a two week extension.

2. Millchris did not need to attend the site development itself or by its solicitor; the adjudicator could attend by himself and make his own mind up.

3. The  application was refused.

Comment

This is a robust decision which continues the well-established policy of pushing and supporting adjudication wherever possible, except in clear circumstances of serious breach of natural justice. Note that none of the tests for granting an injunction set by the leading case, American Cyanamid , were met  (e.g., there was no serious underlying issue, and damages would not be sufficient, etc). 

 

Need Mediation?

Get in touch to find out more about our mediation, training and other services today

Get in Touch

Copyright © 2018 Robert Langley Mediation Newcastle

Design & Build by r//evolution